Question: “Why do you keep going back to the same places?”…Well, there’s more than one answer to that question. Sometimes it’s because the place is easily accessible to me, or it’s a place that I like visiting. Other times it’s because the weather conditions were not ideal at the time of my visit or simply because I still haven’t got the photo that makes me go “WOW!”…
In practical terms, nothing illustrates the reason why, better than the following examples. Photos 1 and 4 were shot about a year apart. Photos 2 and 3 were taken on the same day, about 15 minutes apart.
Photo 1 was taken on my last visit to Lisbon, just a week ago. For those of you who’ve yet to experience Lisbon, this is Ponte Vasco da Gama, the second of the two bridges that cross the river Tejo (Tagus) in Lisbon. It’s about 16 or 17 km long or something along that mark…Well, It’s a long bridge…

Photo 1 : Nikon D2Xs, 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF AF-S Nikkor, ISO 100, 1/40 at f16, 3-stop Soft-Step Singh-Ray ND filter
I was actually tricked by the weather the day I took this photo…I woke up very early that day, and decided last minute to go for a drive down to the south of Portugal. When I woke up the skies were clear and full of stars, as I looked out of my bedroom window. Because the window faced north, I could not see that big storm heading south until I got in the car. The skies on the horizon were looking too menacing, and after a week of being rained on, all that I wanted was to see a sunrise, or the sun, for that matter…
So rather than following the storm, I stopped near the bridge, and never crossed it. Spent some time photographing it instead. After the sun was well above the horizon, I went for a nice breakfast…Will not bore you with what was on the menu, but it was delicious… : )
A 3-stop Soft-Step ND Singh-Ray filter was used to balance the exposure. Why the choice of a Soft-Step filter rather than a Hard-Step? The Hard-Step filter would have given me a more abrupt transition from 0 to 3-stops. The use of this filter would have not been ideal in this situation, as the clouds created and uneven horizon, just where the light is brighter along the top of the cloud formation. The Soft-Step filter, on the other hand, gave me a softer transition as the gradation on the filter changes softly from 0 to 3-stops.
Photos 2 and 3 are simply varitions of the same scene, taken about 15 minutes or so apart. At the time I did not have the Singh-Ray Reverse ND filters, but they would have been my choice for photo 3, as the horizon is considerably brighter than the rest of the scene.

Photo 2 : Nikon D2X, 17-55mm f/2.8D ED-IF AF-S DX Nikkor, ISO 100, 1/2s at f9, 3-stop Hard-Step Singh-Ray ND filter

Photo 3 : Nikon D2X, 17-55mm f/2.8D ED-IF AF-S DX Nikkor, ISO 100, 1/10s at f10, 3-stop Hard-Step Singh-Ray ND filte
I think that photo 4 is the most dramatic of all in terms of light. The clouds also add a lot to the drama. At the time, I initially turned my back on this scene as the light was not that exciting. So I walked back to the car. But as I reached my car after a 10 min walk, I looked back and saw the light changing. You can just imagine what happened next…I ran back to the scene!…

Photo 4 : Nikon D2X, 17-55mm f/2.8D ED-IF AF-S DX Nikkor, ISO 100, 1/50s at f9, 3-stop Hard-Step Singh-Ray ND filter
So…Back to the initial question…Some scenes do offer a lot of potential. I could have easily posted another 2 or 3 other shots of the same scene that look completely different. I will be back for sure, as my work here is not yet complete…